Table of contents
Table of contents
Need advice before you get started?
Book an appointment
Need advice before you get started?
Book an appointment
Every medical consultation begins with an essential step: understanding the patient.
What are their symptoms? Since when have they appeared? How have they evolved? What treatments are they taking? What is their medical and family history?
This phase of information gathering, called anamnesis (see our article: Anamnesis: definition, method and role in the medical consultation), constitutes the starting point of any medical decision. Before being able to examine, diagnose or propose a care plan, the doctor must first understand their patient.
Yet, this step mobilises a significant portion of consultation time. In a context marked by a shortage of doctors, increasing healthcare needs and growing pressure on medical time, a question arises: why do professionals still devote so much time to gathering patient information?
To understand how artificial intelligence can help improve certain stages of the care pathway, also discover our series of articles on medical AI: between promises, initial uses and real limitations.
Consultations often begin without all the information
Contrary to what one might imagine, the information required for a (good) consultation is not always immediately available.
Even when doctors have access to their patient's medical records, some data often remains incomplete, outdated or difficult to use:
symptoms described in a vague manner;
chronology of events difficult to reconstruct;
forgotten treatments;
history not mentioned;
information scattered among several healthcare professionals;
contextual factors insufficiently explored.
Ideally, the doctor must then ask numerous questions in order to understand the situation precisely.
This step is essential. Missing or misinterpreted information can steer the clinical analysis in the wrong direction or delay appropriate care.
Consultations often begin without all the information
Contrary to what one might imagine, the information required for a (good) consultation is not always immediately available.
Even when doctors have access to their patient's medical records, some data often remains incomplete, outdated or difficult to use:
symptoms described in a vague manner;
chronology of events difficult to reconstruct;
forgotten treatments;
history not mentioned;
information scattered among several healthcare professionals;
contextual factors insufficiently explored.
Ideally, the doctor must then ask numerous questions in order to understand the situation precisely.
This step is essential. Missing or misinterpreted information can steer the clinical analysis in the wrong direction or delay appropriate care.
Medical information is complex by nature
Symptoms are often subjective. Two patients presenting with the same pathology can describe it in a completely different way.
Some information is difficult to express. Other details may seem trivial to the patient even though they are important to the healthcare professional.
Added to this is the diversity of clinical situations. A symptom does not have the same meaning depending on:
the patient's age;
their history;
their treatments;
their lifestyle;
the context in which it appears.
The professional must therefore constantly adapt their questions, while respecting a tight constraint: time.
In general practice, for example, a consultation often lasts between 15 and 20 minutes. During this limited timeframe, the doctor must understand the patient's situation, perform their clinical examination, explain their approach, answer questions and make decisions.
Every minute spent reconstructing the patient's history is a minute that cannot be dedicated to explanation, prevention or support.
Medical information is complex by nature
Symptoms are often subjective. Two patients presenting with the same pathology can describe it in a completely different way.
Some information is difficult to express. Other details may seem trivial to the patient even though they are important to the healthcare professional.
Added to this is the diversity of clinical situations. A symptom does not have the same meaning depending on:
the patient's age;
their history;
their treatments;
their lifestyle;
the context in which it appears.
The professional must therefore constantly adapt their questions, while respecting a tight constraint: time.
In general practice, for example, a consultation often lasts between 15 and 20 minutes. During this limited timeframe, the doctor must understand the patient's situation, perform their clinical examination, explain their approach, answer questions and make decisions.
Every minute spent reconstructing the patient's history is a minute that cannot be dedicated to explanation, prevention or support.
A major stake for the quality of care
The gathering of information is not a simple administrative formality. It constitutes one of the most important steps of the consultation.
A precise understanding of the situation notably allows:
to guide complementary tests;
to identify risk factors;
to detect certain warning signs;
to personalise care;
to avoid certain unnecessary tests.
Indeed, numerous studies show that a major part of the information required for medical reasoning is obtained during the interview with the patient. A study published in 2024 in JMIR Medical Education (1) points out that the clinical history contributes to about 80% of the diagnosis, while the physical examination and complementary tests mainly serve to confirm or refine the hypotheses formulated during the interview with the patient.
The quality of the information gathering therefore directly influences the quality of medical decisions.
A major stake for the quality of care
The gathering of information is not a simple administrative formality. It constitutes one of the most important steps of the consultation.
A precise understanding of the situation notably allows:
to guide complementary tests;
to identify risk factors;
to detect certain warning signs;
to personalise care;
to avoid certain unnecessary tests.
Indeed, numerous studies show that a major part of the information required for medical reasoning is obtained during the interview with the patient. A study published in 2024 in JMIR Medical Education (1) points out that the clinical history contributes to about 80% of the diagnosis, while the physical examination and complementary tests mainly serve to confirm or refine the hypotheses formulated during the interview with the patient.
The quality of the information gathering therefore directly influences the quality of medical decisions.
The hidden cost of time spent on history taking
In a healthcare system under strain with doctors working under pressure, medical time has become an particularly valuable resource.
When several minutes are spent reconstructing the clinical history:
the time available for explanation decreases;
prevention is sometimes addressed less;
some of the patient's questions remain unanswered;
the cognitive load on the doctor increases.
On the scale of a medical practice, a health centre or a hospital, these few minutes repeated dozens of times each day represent a considerable volume of medical time.
The challenge is therefore not to reduce the quality of the history taking, but to find ways to better prepare for this essential step.
The hidden cost of time spent on history taking
In a healthcare system under strain with doctors working under pressure, medical time has become an particularly valuable resource.
When several minutes are spent reconstructing the clinical history:
the time available for explanation decreases;
prevention is sometimes addressed less;
some of the patient's questions remain unanswered;
the cognitive load on the doctor increases.
On the scale of a medical practice, a health centre or a hospital, these few minutes repeated dozens of times each day represent a considerable volume of medical time.
The challenge is therefore not to reduce the quality of the history taking, but to find ways to better prepare for this essential step.
Towards a Smarter Preparation of the Consultation
The question is not about eliminating history-taking or replacing the exchange between the physician and their patient. On the contrary, this phase remains at the heart of medical practice.
Rather, the challenge is to better prepare for this exchange. In many fields, certain information is gathered before the main interaction in order to devote more time to high-value-added topics. Healthcare is gradually following the same evolution.
Pre-consultation medical assistants like Aldebaran now make it possible to collect certain information before the consultation: reason for the visit, symptoms, history, treatments, or even the medical context.
But the true innovation does not lie solely in the dematerialisation of forms. The newest approaches seek to adapt questions to each situation in order to gather more relevant, complete, and better-structured information, while positively engaging the patient.
The goal is simple: to allow the physician to approach the consultation with an initial level of understanding of the situation rather than starting with a blank slate.
The professional naturally retains their central role. They verify, complete, and deepen the information gathered. But they can devote more time to clinical analysis, explanation, decision-making, and patient support.
In a context where the demand for care continues to rise, the ability to better prepare for consultations could become a significant lever for improving access to care and the quality of patient pathways.
To delve deeper into this topic, also discover our article: "What is a medical pre-consultation?" as well as our guide dedicated to smart medical questionnaires.
Conclusion
The time spent collecting patient information remains essential to the quality of care today.
However, faced with growing pressure on the healthcare system, new approaches are emerging to optimise this step without degrading the doctor-patient relationship.
The challenge is not to gather more information.
The challenge is to gather the right information, at the right time, to enable healthcare professionals to devote more time to what makes their profession valuable: listening, analysing, explaining, and treating.
Towards a Smarter Preparation of the Consultation
The question is not about eliminating history-taking or replacing the exchange between the physician and their patient. On the contrary, this phase remains at the heart of medical practice.
Rather, the challenge is to better prepare for this exchange. In many fields, certain information is gathered before the main interaction in order to devote more time to high-value-added topics. Healthcare is gradually following the same evolution.
Pre-consultation medical assistants like Aldebaran now make it possible to collect certain information before the consultation: reason for the visit, symptoms, history, treatments, or even the medical context.
But the true innovation does not lie solely in the dematerialisation of forms. The newest approaches seek to adapt questions to each situation in order to gather more relevant, complete, and better-structured information, while positively engaging the patient.
The goal is simple: to allow the physician to approach the consultation with an initial level of understanding of the situation rather than starting with a blank slate.
The professional naturally retains their central role. They verify, complete, and deepen the information gathered. But they can devote more time to clinical analysis, explanation, decision-making, and patient support.
In a context where the demand for care continues to rise, the ability to better prepare for consultations could become a significant lever for improving access to care and the quality of patient pathways.
To delve deeper into this topic, also discover our article: "What is a medical pre-consultation?" as well as our guide dedicated to smart medical questionnaires.
Conclusion
The time spent collecting patient information remains essential to the quality of care today.
However, faced with growing pressure on the healthcare system, new approaches are emerging to optimise this step without degrading the doctor-patient relationship.
The challenge is not to gather more information.
The challenge is to gather the right information, at the right time, to enable healthcare professionals to devote more time to what makes their profession valuable: listening, analysing, explaining, and treating.
(1) Hampton, J. R., Harrison, M. J. G., Mitchell, J. R. A., Prichard, J. S., & Seymour, C. “Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients.” British Medical Journal, 1975, 2(5969), 486–489.
FAQ
What is a medical history?
Why do doctors ask so many questions?
How long does a medical consultation last?
Why is gathering information important?
How to prepare for a medical consultation?
What is the difference between an anamnesis and a medical record?
What information is typically gathered during the case history?
FAQ
What is a medical history?
Why do doctors ask so many questions?
How long does a medical consultation last?
Why is gathering information important?
How to prepare for a medical consultation?
What is the difference between an anamnesis and a medical record?
What information is typically gathered during the case history?
FAQ
What is a medical history?
Why do doctors ask so many questions?
How long does a medical consultation last?
Why is gathering information important?
How to prepare for a medical consultation?
What is the difference between an anamnesis and a medical record?
What information is typically gathered during the case history?
